1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Supreme Court Approves E-Discovery Amendments to FRCP

Supreme Court Approves E-Discovery Amendments to FRCP

Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.18.06

Last week the United States Supreme Court approved, without comment or dissent, each of the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning the discovery of electronically stored information. Absent contrary congressional action, the amended rules will take effect on December 1, 2006. The amendments are designed to acknowledge the differences between electronically stored information and traditional paper files, including the vastly greater volume of electronic material, differences in the way that electronic files are created, stored, collected and archived, and the particular challenges parties face when trying to identify, preserve, and produce potentially relevant electronic material.

These significant amendments to the Federal Rules include provisions:

  • Requiring E-discovery issues to be examined at the outset of a lawsuit (Rules 16 & 26(f));
  • Requiring the mandatory disclosure of categories and locations of electronically stored information (Rule 26(a)(1)(B));
  • Imposing a “reasonably accessible” standard to determine if a party must produce electronically stored information (Rule 26(b)(2)(B));
  • Introducing a “clawback” provision relating to inadvertently produced privileged information (Rule 26(b)(5)(B));
  • Establishing a standard for the production of electronic files (i.e., “ordinarily maintained” or “reasonably usable”) if a production format is not specified by the requesting party (Rule 34); and
  • Creating a “safe harbor” provision for electronic information that is lost due to the routine operation of IT systems as long as reasonable steps were taken to preserve the information after knowing it was discoverable (Rule 37).

Even before the amendments were approved, we have found that courts increasingly have been following these general principles. We expect much debate and litigation regarding the interpretation of these rules, as parties continue to struggle with the litigation challenges created by electronic discovery.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.25.26

NAIC Intensifies AI Regulatory Focus: What Health Insurance Payors Need to Know

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is intensifying its oversight of how insurers use AI — and the pace of regulatory activity shows no signs of slowing. Over the past several months, the NAIC has published a formal Issue Brief staking out its position on federal AI legislation, launched a multistate AI Evaluation Tool pilot aimed at examining insurers’ AI governance programs, and continued to expand adoption of its AI Model Bulletin across state lines. These developments continue a trend towards enhancing regulation; the NAIC adopted AI Principles in 2020 and a Model Bulletin in 2023 clarifying that existing insurance laws apply to AI systems and establishing expectations for governance, documentation, testing, and third-party oversight. That Model Bulletin has now been adopted in approximately 24 states....