Leading Judge Issues Seminal 89-Page Opinion Imposing Harsh Sanctions for Spoliation
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.23.10
In a sweeping 89-page ruling issued on September 9, 2010, Chief Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm of the District of Maryland granted a default judgment against defendants Creative Pipe, Inc. and its president Mark Pappas based on a finding that Pappas had intentionally destroyed electronic evidence. In addition, because of the egregious conduct that he found to have taken place, Judge Grimm imposed a civil contempt sanction on Pappas of up to two years in prison unless and until he pays the plaintiff's legal fees and costs associated with the spoliation and the ensuing motions practice. (Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93644 (D. Md. Sept. 9, 2010).
This opinion is of particular significance, and is certain to be widely cited, because of its exceptionally thorough review of the legal standards relating to the duty to preserve and spoliation sanctions related to electronically stored information ("ESI"), because of the severity of the sanctions imposed, and because Judge Grimm is recognized nationally as one of the leading judicial authorities on electronic discovery issues. The opinion is also noteworthy in that it highlights concerns raised by the differences regarding preservation obligations and the standards for imposing sanctions among circuits and even individual courts, and observes that "many lawyers, as well as institutional, organizational, or governmental litigants, view preservation obligations as one of the greatest contributors to the cost of litigation being disproportionately expensive in cases where ESI will play an evidentiary role." Because of Judge Grimm's stature in connection with e-discovery issues, this opinion will almost certainly be cited by the chorus seeking further evolution and harmonization of these standards.
For a more detailed analysis of the opinion, click here for the BNA Digital Discovery & e-Evidence article co-authored by Jeane Thomas.
For information regarding an October 13 BNA webinar at which Judge Grimm will discuss these issues with Jeane Thomas and others, click here.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.15.25
On August 15, 2025, the Treasury Department and IRS released updated guidance concerning Beginning of Construction requirements to qualify for clean energy tax credits. This new guidance is critical for developers to consider as they rush to qualify for the tax credits before they expire entirely. The much-anticipated guidance followed the July 7, 2025 Executive Order 14315, Ending Market Distorting Subsidies for Unreliable, Foreign-Controlled Energy Sources (“July 7, 2025 Executive Order”), which signaled that the Trump Administration was planning to strictly enforce the termination of production and investment tax credits for solar and wind facilities that are set to expire under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB Act), covered in more detail here. The new guidance comes at a time when many in the industry are struggling to keep up with the myriad ways that the new administration is working to roll back wind and solar tax credits, leaving developers to piece through the recent guidance to determine how best to structure and invest in clean energy projects given the volatile position of the current administration vis-a-vis wind and solar energy.
Client Alert | 10 min read | 10.15.25
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.14.25
Client Alert | 35 min read | 10.13.25
Building Blocks of Design Law: CJEU rules on LEGO Group Modular Design Protection
