1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |GAO Sustains TRICARE Protest On Multiple Grounds

GAO Sustains TRICARE Protest On Multiple Grounds

Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.18.09

In Health Net Fed Servs., Inc. (Nov. 4, 2009), GAO sustained the protest of Health Net (represented by C&M) against a $16 billion TRICARE award because (1) the agency's past performance evaluation unreasonably gave the awardee significant credit for contracts much smaller than the contract to be awarded and improperly attributed to the awardee the past performance of the awardee's parent and its affiliates; (2) the agency's price realism evaluation failed to consider whether the awardee's staffing reflected a lack of understanding of the technical requirements; (3) the agency overlooked the risk associated with the awardee's proposed plan to hire large percentages of the incumbent workforce; and (4) the agency did not consider, as part of the technical evaluation, the cost savings associated with the protester's proposed approach. In addition to the fatal evaluation errors, GAO also determined that the awardee's use of a former high-level government employee in preparing its proposal created an appearance of impropriety based on the unfair competitive advantage stemming from the individual's earlier access to non-public, proprietary, and source-selection-sensitive information.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.03.26

New Jersey Takes Aim at Algorithmic and Surveillance Pricing: What Landlords and Retailers Need to Know About the FAIR Act and the Fair Price Protection Act

On July 20, 2026, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act into law, making New Jersey the fourth state to regulate algorithmic rent-setting practices. Three days later, on July 23, 2026, Governor Sherrill signed the Fair Price Protection Act, which targets “surveillance pricing”—the practice of using or collecting personal data about a user and using an algorithm or artificial intelligence to charge different consumers different prices for the same products. Together, these laws represent a significant expansion of New Jersey's consumer protection framework in the algorithmic pricing context....