Export Controls: Long Overdue But Still Waiting – ITAR Amendment on Dual/Third-Country Nationals
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.16.11
The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) published its final rule (76 Fed. Reg. 28174 (May 16, 2011)) today easing its longstanding policy of requiring authorized foreign recipients of ITAR-controlled technical data or defense articles to obtain express authorization before allowing full-time employees who are dual or third-country nationals to have access to controlled items. The ITAR amendment replaces specific government authorization with a requirement that approved foreign end-users screen employees, affirmatively decide to permit access, and maintain records of screening procedures. This liberalization is not effective until August 15, 2011, although DDTC has promised to provide guidance on how to transition in the interim.
The amended policy applies to "regular employees," a term expanded from the proposed rule to include not just permanent employees of a company but also full-time contractors who work exclusively for a company at its facilities, under the company's direction and control. Transfers to dual and third-country nationals must take place within the physical territory of the country where the end-user is located, where the governmental entity or international organization conducts official business, or where the consignee operates, and also be within the scope of an approved export authorization or exemption. Foreign end-users may satisfy the requirement for screening procedures by (1) requiring a security clearance approved by the host nation government for its employees, or (2) implementing a process to screen employees for "substantive contacts" with restricted or prohibited countries listed in 22 CFR § 126.1 and obtaining Non-Disclosure Agreements from employees. The rule provides several examples of what would constitute "substantive contacts" with a 126.1 country. Transfers of defense articles and technical data to employees of foreign licensees with such contacts will continue to require express authorization from DDTC. Notably, while the amendment does not define the term "dual national," the preamble states that "citizens who relinquish citizenship of the former country would not require screening." (76 Fed. Reg. at 28176)
While the new rule is a welcome departure from State's prior restrictive policy regarding dual and third-country nationals, it is not a full about-face. The rule imposes significant procedural, screening, and recordkeeping obligations on foreign licensees, for which U.S. applicants will undoubtedly ultimately be held accountable.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
