1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |DOD Issues Final OCI Rule For Major Programs

DOD Issues Final OCI Rule For Major Programs

Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.30.10

In its much anticipated final OCI rule, issued December 29, 2010, DOD limited the new provisions to changes required by the Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 for major defense acquisition programs ("MDAPs") and pre-MDAP programs, in contrast to the proposed rule, which would have been applicable to all DOD acquisitions. Additional key changes from the proposed rule include: (i) making clear that this final rule takes precedence over FAR subpart 9.5, to the extent that there are inconsistencies; (ii) adding an explanation of the basic goals to promote competition and preserve DOD access to the expertise of qualified contractors; (iii) removing the formal preference for mitigation as the preferred resolution strategy; (iv) tightening the System Engineering and Technical Assistance ("SETA") contractor exception for domain experience and expertise to require a head of the contracting activity determination; and (v) refining definitions of major subcontractor and systems engineering and technical assistance.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.30.26

Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right: GAO Sustains Protest Where Agency Tried to Fix PIA Violation with a Second PIA Violation

Recent sustain decisions by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC and Reliance Test & Technology send a clear message: when an agency tries to fix a Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) violation by committing a second one, the cure can be just as fatal as the disease. The cases involved the U.S. Air Force’s $1.8 billion procurement for O&M services at Elgin Air Force Base. During discussions, the Air Force inadvertently released a pricing overview slide with all offerors’ bottom-line evaluated costs to Reliance Test & Technology, which immediately notified the agency of the error. In response, the Air Force decided to level the playing field by providing the same information to all the other offerors in the procurement, stating, “[o]fferors may consider this disclosure in their [final proposal revision].”...