Déjà Vu: Another FAR Rule On Contractor Codes Of Business Ethics And Conduct
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.26.07
The Federal Register of November 23 published a final rule (http://www.crowell.com/PDF/FAR-Rule-On-Contractor-Codes_Federal-Register_11-23-07.pdf), effective December 24, which adds new features to the FAR mandating specified contractor standards of conduct (except for commercial item contracts and contracts to be performed entirely outside the United States), for new contracts expected to exceed $5 million (base plus option year value) and performance of 120 days or more (including flow down to subcontractors of the same value and performance duration). The mandated standards of conduct include (i) having a written code of business ethics and conduct; (ii) providing a copy of the code to all employees performing the contract; (iii) promoting compliance with the code; and (iv) except for small businesses, establishing an ongoing business ethics and conduct awareness program and an internal control system which facilitates timely discovery of improper conduct in connection with Government contracts and ensures prompt corrective actions (such program to include periodic reviews of company business practices, a "hotline," internal and/or external audits, and discipline for improper conduct).
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25
