Déjà Vu: Another FAR Rule On Contractor Codes Of Business Ethics And Conduct
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.26.07
The Federal Register of November 23 published a final rule (http://www.crowell.com/PDF/FAR-Rule-On-Contractor-Codes_Federal-Register_11-23-07.pdf), effective December 24, which adds new features to the FAR mandating specified contractor standards of conduct (except for commercial item contracts and contracts to be performed entirely outside the United States), for new contracts expected to exceed $5 million (base plus option year value) and performance of 120 days or more (including flow down to subcontractors of the same value and performance duration). The mandated standards of conduct include (i) having a written code of business ethics and conduct; (ii) providing a copy of the code to all employees performing the contract; (iii) promoting compliance with the code; and (iv) except for small businesses, establishing an ongoing business ethics and conduct awareness program and an internal control system which facilitates timely discovery of improper conduct in connection with Government contracts and ensures prompt corrective actions (such program to include periodic reviews of company business practices, a "hotline," internal and/or external audits, and discipline for improper conduct).
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.30.26
Recent sustain decisions by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC and Reliance Test & Technology send a clear message: when an agency tries to fix a Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) violation by committing a second one, the cure can be just as fatal as the disease. The cases involved the U.S. Air Force’s $1.8 billion procurement for O&M services at Elgin Air Force Base. During discussions, the Air Force inadvertently released a pricing overview slide with all offerors’ bottom-line evaluated costs to Reliance Test & Technology, which immediately notified the agency of the error. In response, the Air Force decided to level the playing field by providing the same information to all the other offerors in the procurement, stating, “[o]fferors may consider this disclosure in their [final proposal revision].”
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.29.26
What University Licensors Should Learn From TexasLDPC v. Broadcom
Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.28.26
Debriefing to Dead Briefing: How to Avoid Dismissal by Identifying “Required” Debriefings
