1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |CPSC Votes to Lower Lead Content Ban for Children's Products to 100 ppm

CPSC Votes to Lower Lead Content Ban for Children's Products to 100 ppm

Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.14.11

On July 13, 2011, the Consumer Product Safety Commission ("Commission") voted 3 to 2 to allow the 100 ppm lead content ban on children's products to go into effect on August 14, 2011. Pursuant to Section 101 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 ("CPSIA"), "unless the Commission determines that a limit of 100 parts per million is not technologically feasible for a product or product category," the lead content limit for children's products will become 100 ppm three years after the date of enactment of the CPSIA.

The vote broke down on party lines with Chairman Inez Tenenbaum and Commissioners Robert Adler and Thomas Moore voting that 100 ppm is a technologically feasible limit and Commissioners Nancy Nord and Anne Northrup voting that the limit is not technologically feasible. Commissioner Nord also introduced an amendment to the 100 ppm limit to exempt products made from recycled materials which was defeated 3 - 2.

Accordingly, as of August 14, any children’s product as defined in section 3(a)(16) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, except those subject to specific exclusions, that contains more than 100 ppm lead content shall be treated as a banned hazardous substance under the Federal hazardous Substances Act. The new lead content limit will apply retroactively to all children's products covered by the ban regardless of the date of manufacturing.

Note that the new lead content limit does not affect the Commission's current stay of enforcement of third party testing and certification requirements for children’s products subject to the lead content limit (except for metal components of children's metal jewelry) which is still in effect until December 31, 2011, at which time the stay will expire. Furthermore, neither the lower lead content limit nor the stay of enforcement of the testing and certification to the lead content limit affects the current lead paint limit of 90 ppm and the certification and third party testing requirements for children's products subject to the lead paint limit.

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights