CPSC Votes to Lower Lead Content Ban for Children's Products to 100 ppm
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.14.11
On July 13, 2011, the Consumer Product Safety Commission ("Commission") voted 3 to 2 to allow the 100 ppm lead content ban on children's products to go into effect on August 14, 2011. Pursuant to Section 101 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 ("CPSIA"), "unless the Commission determines that a limit of 100 parts per million is not technologically feasible for a product or product category," the lead content limit for children's products will become 100 ppm three years after the date of enactment of the CPSIA.
The vote broke down on party lines with Chairman Inez Tenenbaum and Commissioners Robert Adler and Thomas Moore voting that 100 ppm is a technologically feasible limit and Commissioners Nancy Nord and Anne Northrup voting that the limit is not technologically feasible. Commissioner Nord also introduced an amendment to the 100 ppm limit to exempt products made from recycled materials which was defeated 3 - 2.
Accordingly, as of August 14, any children’s product as defined in section 3(a)(16) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, except those subject to specific exclusions, that contains more than 100 ppm lead content shall be treated as a banned hazardous substance under the Federal hazardous Substances Act. The new lead content limit will apply retroactively to all children's products covered by the ban regardless of the date of manufacturing.
Note that the new lead content limit does not affect the Commission's current stay of enforcement of third party testing and certification requirements for children’s products subject to the lead content limit (except for metal components of children's metal jewelry) which is still in effect until December 31, 2011, at which time the stay will expire. Furthermore, neither the lower lead content limit nor the stay of enforcement of the testing and certification to the lead content limit affects the current lead paint limit of 90 ppm and the certification and third party testing requirements for children's products subject to the lead paint limit.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
