Ellie Riegel

Associate | She/Her/Hers

Overview

Ellie Riegel is an associate in the firm's Washington, D.C. office, where she practices in the Litigation and Government Contracts groups. Ellie’s work primarily includes complex civil litigation in federal and state forums. She focuses on a range of government contracts issues, including government investigations, client counseling, and bid protests before the Government Accountability Office.

Ellie maintains an active pro bono practice, with a focus on indigent criminal defense and civil rights. She recently successfully represented an individual incarcerated in federal prison in proceedings before the U.S. Parole Commission, where her team secured parole for her client after he spent 26 years in federal prison. She serves as an associate trustee for the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs.

During law school, Ellie was a member of both the Criminal Defense Clinic and the Civil Rights Clinic. She also served on the management board of the Program in Law and Public Service and was an assistant articles editor for the Virginia Journal of Social Policy & The Law.

Career & Education

|
    • University of South Carolina, B.A., magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, 2016
    • University of Virginia, J.D., 2020
    • University of South Carolina, B.A., magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, 2016
    • University of Virginia, J.D., 2020
    • District of Columbia
    • Oregon
    • District of Columbia
    • Oregon

Ellie's Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.20.22

N.Y. Federal Court Says Daubert and Rule 702 Gatekeeping Role “Ill Suited” for Class Certification

In Watson v. Manhattan Luxury Automobiles, the Southern District of New York weighed in on the ongoing debate over whether scientific evidence offered in relation to a motion for class certification must meet the Daubert standard of reliability, which has been the subject of a deepening circuit split. In dicta, the Supreme Court implied that expert evidence at the class certification stage likely would be required to meet the standards of Daubert in at least some circumstances, but it has yet to definitely decide the issue. The Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits require scientific evidence to satisfy a full Daubert analysis at the class certification stage, while the Eighth Circuit requires only a “limited” Daubert analysis. The remaining circuits, including the Second Circuit, have not yet issued clear rulings on the matter.  ...

Ellie's Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.20.22

N.Y. Federal Court Says Daubert and Rule 702 Gatekeeping Role “Ill Suited” for Class Certification

In Watson v. Manhattan Luxury Automobiles, the Southern District of New York weighed in on the ongoing debate over whether scientific evidence offered in relation to a motion for class certification must meet the Daubert standard of reliability, which has been the subject of a deepening circuit split. In dicta, the Supreme Court implied that expert evidence at the class certification stage likely would be required to meet the standards of Daubert in at least some circumstances, but it has yet to definitely decide the issue. The Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits require scientific evidence to satisfy a full Daubert analysis at the class certification stage, while the Eighth Circuit requires only a “limited” Daubert analysis. The remaining circuits, including the Second Circuit, have not yet issued clear rulings on the matter.  ...