1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |The Spigot is Open: DOJ Reports First Civil Settlement for Paycheck Protection Program Fraud

The Spigot is Open: DOJ Reports First Civil Settlement for Paycheck Protection Program Fraud

Client Alert | 2 min read | 01.21.21

On January 12, 2021, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the first civil settlement resolving allegations of fraud involving loans issued pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). SlideBelts Inc., an internet retail company, and Brigham Taylor, the company’s president and CEO, agreed to pay $100,000 in penalties and damages to resolve alleged violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) and the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). This settlement demonstrates DOJ’s resolve to hold accountable those who exploit federal programs intended to help those in need during the COVID-19 Pandemic. This settlement also marks the first of what will undoubtedly be a long line of FCA recoveries in the months and years to come involving alleged misconduct in applying for PPP loans first authorized under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

According to the stipulated facts in the settlement, SlideBelts filed a petition for bankruptcy relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on August 25, 2019. However, the PPP application and SBA’s interim final rules explicitly prohibit debtors in bankruptcy proceedings at the time of application or any time before the loan is disbursed from receiving PPP funds. Nevertheless, on April 3, 2020, SlideBelts submitted an application for a PPP loan for approximately $300,000. A few days later, SlideBelts submitted a second PPP loan application to a second financial institution for $350,000. Taylor and SlideBelts falsely certified on both applications that SlideBelts was not presently involved in any bankruptcy. When the first lender discovered that SlideBelts was in bankruptcy proceedings and rejected the PPP application for that reason, Taylor and SlideBelts applied for a third PPP loan at a different financial institution that same day, certifying a third time that SlideBelts was not presently involved in any bankruptcy. Ultimately, Taylor’s false statements induced the second lender to disburse a $350,000 PPP loan to SlideBelts.

The relatively straightforward facts of the SlideBelts case made this settlement a seeming slam dunk for the DOJ, as the false statements on the PPP applications clearly constituted false certifications of eligibility to obtain a PPP loan. While the government asserted that its potential claims totaled over $4 million in damages and penalties, the relatively low $100,000 settlement was driven by SlideBelts’ and Taylor’s financial condition, though notably that amount is in addition to the defendants’ full repayment of the $350,000 loan. The DOJ stands to collect a much larger sum, however, if SlideBelts defaults on its payment obligations, as SlideBelts entered into a $2 million consent decree with DOJ. Either way, the message here is loud and clear: the government will aggressively pursue recoveries against companies and individuals for PPP fraud regardless of their financial status, government contracting experience, or relative size of the loan at issue.

Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 03.26.24

California Office of Health Care Affordability Notice Requirement for Material Change Transactions Closing on or After April 1, 2024

Starting next week, on April 1st, health care entities in California closing “material change transactions” will be required to notify California’s new Office of Health Care Affordability (“OHCA”) and potentially undergo an extensive review process prior to closing. The new review process will impact a broad range of providers, payers, delivery systems, and pharmacy benefit managers with either a current California footprint or a plan to expand into the California market. While health care service plans in California are already subject to an extensive transaction approval process by the Department of Managed Health Care, other health care entities in California have not been required to file notices of transactions historically, and so the notice requirement will have a significant impact on how health care entities need to structure and close deals in California, and the timing on which closing is permitted to occur....