1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Senior DOJ Official Reinforces Role of Leniency, Compliance Programs to Deter Bid Rigging and Anticompetitive Procurement Conduct

Senior DOJ Official Reinforces Role of Leniency, Compliance Programs to Deter Bid Rigging and Anticompetitive Procurement Conduct

Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.21.20

Richard Powers, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Criminal Enforcement, spoke at the ABA’s International Cartel Workshop on February 19, 2020, discussing the strong commitment the Division has to its leniency program as a core tool for effectively combatting cartel conduct. Powers stressed the complementary nature of leniency and partnerships such as the PCSF in creating a holistic approach to detecting, deterring, and prosecuting bid rigging and other criminal antitrust violations. He singled out small- and medium-sized government contractors as the focus of the PCSF’s deterrent effect, stating “[t]he reality is that small and medium-sized businesses that are tempted to collude on government contracts or subcontracts are more likely to be deterred by wide-spread awareness of the illegality of bid rigging and active enforcement, which is why the Justice Department established the PCSF.”

Powers also addressed the role of effective corporate compliance programs, calling them “the first line of defense in preventing these crimes.” He explained that while corporate compliance programs are now taken into account at the charging stage and a factor that weighs in favor of Deferred Prosecution Agreement, companies should not view the credit given for corporate compliance programs as a substitute for leniency, which he said “will continue to be the ultimate credit for an effective compliance program that detects antitrust crimes and allows prompt self-reporting.”

Insights

Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.18.24

GSA Clarifies Permissibility of Upfront Payments for Software-as-a-Service Offerings

On March 15, 2024, the General Services Administration (GSA) issued Acquisition Letter MV-2024-01 providing guidance to GSA contracting officers on the use of upfront payments for acquisitions of cloud-based Software-as-a-Service (SaaS).  Specifically, this acquisition letter clarifies that despite statutory prohibitions against the use of “advance” payments outside of narrowly-prescribed circumstances, upfront payments for SaaS licenses do not constitute an “advance” payment subject to these restrictions when made under the following conditions:...