1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |ASBCA Rejects the Government’s Use of "Prior Material Breach" Affirmative Defense

ASBCA Rejects the Government’s Use of "Prior Material Breach" Affirmative Defense

Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.24.19

In Engility, LLC, ASBCA No. 61281 (August 19, 2019), the ASBCA denied the government’s motion to amend its answer to include the affirmative defense of prior material breach. The matter involved the government’s disallowance of settlement costs paid by Engility following a lawsuit in which Iraqi plaintiffs alleged that Engility’s employees engaged in abuse at Abu Ghraib. Before the government’s motion, the parties had engaged in costly and time consuming discovery after the government argued that under Geren v. Tecom, Inc., 566 F.3d 1037 (Fed. Cir. 2009), Engility had to demonstrate that none of its employees engaged in the alleged abusive conduct, and therefore the Iraqi plaintiffs had very little likelihood of success on the merits. Engility opposed the government’s motion to amend its answer because, among other reasons, the amendment would exponentially expand the scope of already extensive discovery. The ASBCA requested supplemental briefing on the government’s motion, which clarified the government’s position: the affirmative defense of Engility’s alleged prior material breach would be invoked only in the event the Board found that Engility’s settlement costs were allowable and, thus, the government’s disallowance would breach the contract’s Allowable Cost and Payment clause. The government also stated that it did not intend to argue that Engility’s alleged prior material breach was related to the Iraqi plaintiff’s allegations.  In denying the motion, the Board stated that “It is a legal impossibility for the government to raise the affirmative defense of prior material breach as a defense against what the government itself admits is essentially the possibility that its own claim may fail.” 

Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 03.26.24

California Office of Health Care Affordability Notice Requirement for Material Change Transactions Closing on or After April 1, 2024

Starting next week, on April 1st, health care entities in California closing “material change transactions” will be required to notify California’s new Office of Health Care Affordability (“OHCA”) and potentially undergo an extensive review process prior to closing. The new review process will impact a broad range of providers, payers, delivery systems, and pharmacy benefit managers with either a current California footprint or a plan to expand into the California market. While health care service plans in California are already subject to an extensive transaction approval process by the Department of Managed Health Care, other health care entities in California have not been required to file notices of transactions historically, and so the notice requirement will have a significant impact on how health care entities need to structure and close deals in California, and the timing on which closing is permitted to occur....