1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |To Disclose or Not To Disclose: Federal Government & Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

To Disclose or Not To Disclose: Federal Government & Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.16.17

On November 15, 2017, the White House Cybersecurity Coordinator, Rob Joyce, announced a formative cybersecurity policy entitled “Vulnerabilities Equities Policy and Process for the United States Government.”

According to the policy, the primary focus is to “prioritize the public's interest in cybersecurity and to protect core Internet infrastructure, information systems, critical infrastructure systems, and the U.S. economy through the disclosure of vulnerabilities discovered by the United States Government (USG).” The Vulnerabilities Equities Process (VEP) balances dissemination of vulnerability information (e.g., zero day exploits) to the vendor/supplier in the expectation that it will be patched with temporarily restricting the knowledge of the vulnerability to the USG, and potentially other partners, so that it can be used for national security and law enforcement purposes, such as intelligence collection, military operations, and/or counterintelligence. In striking this balance, the policy aims to increase transparency regarding the process for the public and businesses, and also signals that the US will join with several countries that have announced formal policies in this area regarding management of vulnerabilities. Interestingly, this policy expands the management of vulnerabilities to include a broad array of national security and intelligence agencies.

This policy supersedes the Commercial and Government Information Technology and Industrial Control Product or System Vulnerabilities Equities Policy and Process, dated February 16, 2010.

This policy applies to all USG components and personnel and contractors and includes Government off-the-shelf (GOTS), Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS), or other commercial information systems (to include open-source software), Industrial Control Systems (ICS) or products, and associated systems such as Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) and Distributed Control Systems (DCS).

Businesses and the public will likely be interested in the annual public reporting that is promised, which may include statistics about how many vulnerabilities go through the process and even potentially how long they are withheld from disclosure.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.25.24

JUST RELEASED: EPA’s Bold New Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Collaboration Policy

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) just issued its new Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy, setting the stage for the new manner in which the agency manages its pollution investigations. David M. Uhlmann, the head of OECA, signed the Policy memorandum on April 17, 2024, in order to ensure that EPA’s civil and criminal enforcement offices collaborate efficiently and consistently in cases across the nation. The Policy states, “EPA must exercise enforcement discretion reasonably when deciding whether a particular matter warrants criminal, civil, or administrative enforcement. Criminal enforcement should be reserved for the most egregious violations.” Uhlmann repeated this statement during a luncheon on April 23, 2024, while also emphasizing the new level of energy this collaborative effort has brought to the enforcement programs....