Navy Identifies Defense Industrial Base Cyber Shortcomings in New Report
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.22.19
The Navy has released its Cybersecurity Readiness Review, drafted at the Secretary’s request, in response to recent losses of classified and unclassified data. The Review calls attention to the contracting community’s key role in safeguarding critical government data – and the perceived shortcomings of the current acquisition system in achieving that end. Despite mandatory contract requirements such as DFARS 252.204-7012, the Review notes that the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) has experienced “a flood of breaches” and “continues to hemorrhage critical data.” In response, the Review recommends:
- Holding individuals personally accountable for achieving mandated standards.
- Ensuring the supply chain is “delivered uncompromised” for mission readiness.
- Creating cybersecurity “go/no-go” criteria for capabilities.
- Expanding information sharing with DIB partners to better identify risks and priorities.
- Working with industry trade groups to assist subcontractors in improving cyber defenses.
Contacts
Senior Counsel
She/Her/Hers
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 04.16.24
Navigating the AI Intellectual Property Maze - Key Points From Congressional Hearing
On April 10, 2024, the U.S. House of Representatives, Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Intellectual Property convened Part III to an ongoing discussion and exploration of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP) rights. The session, “Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Part III - IP Protection for AI-Assisted Inventions and Creative Works,” delved into the nuanced debate over what IP protections should exist for AI-generated or AI-assisted works.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 04.15.24
Making the EU Courts More Efficient for Trade-Related Decisions
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.15.24
New FAR Part 40 to Address Supply Chain and Information Security Requirements
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.11.24
U.S. Chamber Submits Comments on the FAR Council’s Proposed Rule Regarding Pay Transparency
