Jeffrey W. Pagano
Partner
jpagano@crowell.com

New York
590 Madison Avenue,
20th Floor
New York, NY 10022-2544
Phone: 212.223.4000
Fax: 212.223.4134

Newsroom


FINRA Proposal Would Give Employees More Latitude in Court Challenges
January 16, 2012 — Broker Dealer (BD) Week

New York-based Labor & Employment  Group co-chair Jeffrey W. Pagano speaks to Broker Dealer (BD) Week about a change that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has proposed to its arbitration system that would assure employees have a right to file more claims in court, as opposed to being forced into arbitration. The change comes shortly after a similar, but broader, ruling was issued by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regarding private employers that use arbitration programs.

According to Pagano, "The recent NLRB decision gives employees even broader latitude to file collective claims in court than FINRA's proposal does."



Crowell & Moring Establishes that an Employer May Unilaterally Exercise Management Rights Implemented after Bargaining Impass
January 31, 2008 — BNA's Daily Labor Report, No. 20, ISSN 1522-5968

A Crowell & Moring team led by Labor & Employment co-chair Jeffrey W. Pagano, with assistance from Herbert Meyer, Glenn Grant and Ira Saxe, successfully argued before the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ("DCCA") on behalf of Mail Contractors of America ("MCA"), and obtained reversal of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") that found that MCA had unlawfully refused to bargain regarding a unilateral change of a driver relay point. The right of MCA, the largest U.S. Postal Service depot to depot mail carrier, to unilaterally change the relay point was contained in the Management Rights provision of MCA's final offer, implemented after impasse. The DCCA squarely rejected the NLRB's position that exercise of that right violated the National Labor Relations Act. The Court's Opinion is a landmark decision, and was featured as the lead article in the January 31, 2008 edition of the BNA Daily Labor Report, as it ensures an employer's ability to operate its business without interference of a union after implementation of a final offer.

Court Documents:
Mail Contractors of America v. NLRB, Nos. 06-1338, 06-1380, 2008 WL 220637 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 29, 2008)

terms of use/privacy policy© Crowell & Moring LLP 2012

contact ussearchsite mapsubscriberss

aboutpracticesprofessionalsofficesnews & eventscareersdiversity