Portrait of Douglas W. Sullivan
Named to BTI Consulting Group's list of "Client Service All-Stars" in 2013 and 2014.
Douglas W. Sullivan, Partner San Francisco
dsullivan@crowell.com
Phone: +1 415.365.7370
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

Douglas Sullivan is a partner in the San Francisco office of Crowell & Moring and is a member of the firm's Litigation, Intellectual Property and Environment, Energy & Resources groups. He focuses on complex commercial litigation, including mergers and acquisitions, intellectual property, entertainment, partnership disputes and dissolutions, construction, real estate, environmental, insurance and securities litigation.

Mr. Sullivan has significant trial experience in state and federal courts, having acted as lead counsel in approximately 15 trials. He has twice been named to BTI Consulting Group's list of "Client Service All-Stars," an annual list comprised of feedback from corporate counsel which recognizes attorneys who deliver the highest levels of excellent client service. Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Mr. Sullivan was a partner with the San Francisco firm of Folger Levin & Kahn LLP.

Representative Matters

Represented companies in the automotive, telecommunications, computer, wood products, and healthcare industries in connection with disputes from mergers and acquisitions, including: Dana Holding Corporation v. Metalsa. (ICC Arbitration) in which we successfully represented Dana in disputes over purchase price adjustments and indemnity claims following the sale of Dana's structural products division, recovering millions of dollars for Dana and defeating claims of Metalsa; NorthPoint Communications Group, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. (San Francisco County Superior Court), in which the client recovered $175 million as part of a settlement; Coram Healthcare Corp. v. Caremark Int'l (San Francisco County Superior Court), in which the client recovered $165 million of the $310 million purchase price.

Represented companies in connection with intellectual property disputes, including: GigOptix, Inc. v. Optomai, Inc., et al. (Santa Clara County Superior Court) in which we obtained a successful settlement for GigOptix against former employees and their companies for misappropriating GigOptix's trade secrets for semiconductor products; Advanced Fibre Communications, Inc. v. Calix Networks, Inc. (District Court, Travis County, Texas), in which we obtained a defense verdict for Calix following a court trial in connection with alleged misappropriation of trade secrets by former employees; Alcatel v. Calix Networks, Inc. (Sonoma County Superior Court), in which Calix successfully defended against claims that approximately 40 former Alcatel employees misappropriated trade secrets in developing a competing telecommunications product; Phase Metrics v. Magnetic Recording Solutions, Inc. (U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.), in which the client, Phase Metrics, obtained a two year injunction for copyright infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets, preventing former employees and their new company from competing against Phase Metrics; Liquid Environmental Solutions of Texas v. U.S. Oil Recovery (Harris County, Texas), in which the client successfully pursued claims of misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of confidentiality agreements against former employees and their new company; Sarkissian Mason v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.) in which we obtained summary judgment in favor of Enterprise against claims of misappropriation of confidential and trade secret information.  Doug has handled dozens of cases involving alleged trade secret misappropriation in industries such as trucking, financial services, wood products, medical device, and computer-aided design.

Represented numerous companies (including AT&T, United Airlines, Prudential Financial, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, The Deutsch Company and others) in connection with complex, high-profile environmental matters. The representation has included pursuing and defending actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), the Clean Water Act (CWA), analogous and related state laws, and common law nuisance and trespass claims, among others. The representation has involved both governmental litigation and third-party tort litigation, including: Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Bell Telephone (U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.) in which we successfully moved to dismiss CWA and RCRA claims related to Pacific Bell's maintenance and disposal of wooden utility poles, and then prevailed on an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; Forest City v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (Los Angeles County Superior Court), in which the client, Prudential, obtained a jury verdict following a three-month trial of claims brought by Forest City in excess of $50 million for a failed real estate development stemming from environmental contamination. The representation has also included defending companies in connection with personal injury and property damage claims by residents and homeowners stemming from environmental contamination.

Represented companies, executives, law firms and lawyers in connection with firm break ups, malpractice claims, including a two month trial in Hirsch Wallerstein, et al. v. Jackoway, Tyerman (Los Angeles County Superior Court), in which we obtained a decision in favor of entertainment lawyers who were sued by their former partners for more than $15 million.

Represented companies in complex class actions, including Withrow, et al. v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (Cir. Court, St. Louis, MO) in which we successfully resolved a nationwide class action related to Enterprises' car sales practices; Cisneros, et al. v. Yahoo! (San Francisco Superior Court) in which we obtained a defense verdict following a trial in which it was alleged that Yahoo! aided and abetted internet gambling; Lemieux, et al. v. AT&T Corp. (U.S. District Court, S.D. Cal) in which we successfully obtained the dismissal of an action in which AT&T was alleged to have violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in processing collect calls; Collins, et al. v. General Electric (U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.) in which we successfully obtained the dismissal of General Electric which was alleged to have misrepresented the energy consumption of its freezers.

Represented companies (including Prudential Financial and KB Home) in real estate, construction and engineering disputes, including in connection with commercial complexes, office buildings, power plants, manufacturing facilities, housing developments, and hotels.

Background image