<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:40:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <title>IP Insights</title>
    <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">049870e1-9d8b-4bb8-85be-da2c6842208f</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:40:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit Holds That Settlement Negotiations Are Not Privileged</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuit-Holds-That-Settlement-Negotiations-Are-Not-Privileged</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24a6747c-4702-41b0-a6cf-d5ea1cdfadc8</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Crowell &amp; Moring's Top Ten Copyright Cases of the Last Year</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/2011-Top-Ten-Intellectual-Property-Copyright-Cases-Crowell-Moring</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bdf8e66e-14b6-4c63-9613-cebfd0fbbe99</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:00:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>What You Should Know About U.S. Copyright Office’s New White Paper on Mass Digitization of Copyrighted Works</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/What-You-Should-Know-About-U.S.-Copyright-Office's-New-White-Paper-on-Mass-Digitization-of Copyrighted-Works</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2ed6336-2cc8-4a6e-a6db-4a5df740fb0a</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Sweeping U.S. Patent Law Changes - America Invents Act</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Sweeping-US-Patent-Law-Changes-America-Invents-Act</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19a35256-5121-4398-87aa-f0e60fa35e93</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>USPTO Announces Prioritized Examination for One Year Prosecution Available May 4th</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/USPTO-Announces-Prioritized-Examination-for-One-Year</link>
      <description>Today the United States Patent and Trademark Office (U.S.P.T.O.) announced a final rule implementing a prioritized examination track with a goal of providing a final disposition of an application within 12 months of prioritized status being granted. A request for prioritized examination may be submitted with any original non-provisional application filed on or after May 4, 2011. 

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">84442c9b-8b0c-460a-bc59-f9744267f80d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Crowell &amp; Moring's Top Ten Copyright Cases of the Last Year</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Crowell-Moring-s-Top-Ten-Copyright-Cases-of-the-Last</link>
      <description>What are the trends that will impact copyright owners in 2011? To answer that question, we start by taking a look at what we believe are the top 10 most significant copyright cases from 2010. Understanding the drivers behind these mega cases, which include two Supreme Court decisions, will be crucial to devising your IP strategy for the coming year.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">edf5ee94-ada4-4fe8-8484-1b019e561377</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Retailers With Websites Containing Store Locator Function Sued In Series of Patent Lawsuits</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Retailers-With-Websites-Containing-Store-Locator-Function</link>
      <description>The last two weeks of 2010 witnessed the launching of what may be the largest patent infringement litigation in the United States. Between December 17, 2010 and December 23, 2010, a "patent troll," Geotag, Inc., filed eight patent infringement lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, each of which alleged infringement of a single patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,930,474 (the "'474 Patent"), against different groups of defendants. The principal targets of these lawsuits were retailers with websites containing a store locator function. More than 300 companies were named in the lawsuits.

 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b4b34de-2e0b-4ac9-93d0-e9bbf7a66b48</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court's Bilski Decision:  Business Method Patents Survive, at Least for Now</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Supreme-Court-s-i-Bilski-i-Decision-Business-Method</link>
      <description>The United States Supreme Court yesterday issued its long-awaited decision in Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. ___ (2010). Although this case was expected to be a vehicle for a definitive pronouncement on the patentability of so-called "business methods," the Supreme Court decided the case on much narrower grounds, leaving the broader question unanswered. Specifically, the Supreme Court agreed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the particular invention at issue, directed to a method for managing risk in commodities markets, was unpatentable.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9f082cff-1299-4550-bc40-4465f8eec551</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Protecting Your Trademark on Facebook</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Protecting-Your-Trademark-on</link>
      <description>Facebook®, the popular social networking system, has announced that starting at 12:01 a.m. (EDT) on Saturday, June 13, 2009, its users will be allowed to create personalized URLs. (see http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=90316352130). This raises the possibility that some Facebook users may try to incorporate third party trademarks as part of their new URLs. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aa7c956d-32b8-471d-8fb0-08c49964db18</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit Affirms Extension of The 30 Month Hatch-Waxman Stay Preventing FDA Approval of Generic Version of Evista</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuit-Affirms-Extension-of-The-30-Month-Hatch</link>
      <description>For the first time, the Federal Circuit has affirmed the extension of a thirty month stay under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (known as the "Hatch-Waxman Act"). The U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana extended the stay because the generic company recast its product, disclosing new samples only eight months before trial was to commence and produced documents after the discovery cut-off. But a vigorous dissent claims that what the majority had done is to "effectively eliminate the statutorily required finding." </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">97a54369-ccc9-4e3a-8fc1-d08d617e7542</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Patent Application Process Must Be Compliant with U.S. Export Controls</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Patent-Application-Process-Must-Be-Compliant-with-U-S-1352006</link>
      <description>Commerce Reinforces the Need for Export Compliance in Patent Transactions. The Department of Commerce – through the U.S. Patent &amp; Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) – is reaching out to patent applicants and practitioners in several ways to ensure compliance with U.S. export control obligations relevant in the patent context. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e93b6e35-ffc9-4c8c-a2a9-42d317e41670</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Judge Upholds Smithkline's Challenge To USPTO Continuation Rules</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Judge-Upholds-Smithkline-s-Challenge-To-USPTO-Continuation</link>
      <description>The US District Court in Alexandria, Virginia today issued an opinion rejecting the PTO's proposed rules (issued last year) that would have limited the filing of continuation applications, as well as the number of claims per application. This result, while not unexpected, at least removes the immediate threat that these draconian measures could have become effective in the near term. It will now be up to the PTO to decide whether it will appeal this decision to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, issue new proposed rules, or give up the idea altogether.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">993ea75a-a2dd-461f-8cd4-9f8aafb4bc35</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>New TTAB Rules Go Into Effect November 1</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/New-TTAB-Rules-Go-Into-Effect-November</link>
      <description>Significant new rules applicable in Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings will go into effect on November 1, 2007. These include a number of new rules governing the parties' conduct at the very early stages of the proceeding.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a715e47-b51f-42ce-a232-7b8568182c72</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Federal Circuit Raises the Bar for Proving Willful Infringement, and Provides for Protection of Trial Counsel Communications and Work Product From Discovery -- Great News for Accused Infringers</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Federal-Circuit-Raises-the-Bar-for-Proving-Willful</link>
      <description>The threat of treble damages against defendants based on allegations of willful infringement has been reduced. Based on the recent unanimous en banc decision of the Federal Circuit, only objectively reckless behavior by a defendant may warrant a finding of willful infringement. Additionally, the Court held that the scope of waiver of privilege resulting from an 'opinion of counsel' defense against willfulness charges does not ordinarily extend to trial counsel, which should provide further assurance to defendants that typically segregate opinion and trial counsel. In re Seagate, No. M830 (Fed. Cir., Aug. 20, 2007).  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30bb3454-199f-4f13-9e4c-ddee5f15a9f5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Controversial New Continuation And Examination Support Document Rules Are Effective November 1, 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Controversial-New-Continuation-And-Examination-Support</link>
      <description>Yesterday, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“the Office”) issued its much-awaited final rules involving continuing applications, requests for continued examination and the numbers of claims to be examined. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de031cdc-9bbd-4de8-afdb-1961389f0fea</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Post-KSR Patent Prosecution “Survival Guide”</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Post-KSR-Patent-Prosecution-Survival-Guide</link>
      <description>In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR International v. Teleflex, US patent applicants are likely to encounter a surge of obviousness rejections from the USPTO. Undoubtedly, KSR has dramatically altered the patent prosecution landscape: some arguments that might have prevailed prior to KSR may no longer be viable. In this alert, we first summarize the KSR decision, and then predict the top arguments for combating post-KSR obviousness rejections before the USPTO. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">054d4098-e541-4ec6-b5ad-026275148fd6</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>US Supreme Court Makes it Easier to Find Patents Obvious</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/US-Supreme-Court-Makes-it-Easier-to-Find-Patents</link>
      <description>In a much-anticipated decision, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, overruled the Federal Circuit’s longstanding test for determining when an invention is "obvious" under the patent statute.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b96e97b6-cc72-4f0a-9fce-616de11107d9</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>MedImmune's Impact May Be Greater Than Many Suspect</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/MedImmune-s-Impact-May-Be-Greater-Than-Many</link>
      <description> </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ced22135-e06d-4424-96e4-fc1774af693f</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court Signals Shift in Obviousness Standard</title>
      <link>http://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/IP-Insights/Supreme-Court-Signals-Shift-in-Obviousness</link>
      <description>A recent oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court may be signaling a shift in the patent landscape towards increased difficulty in obtaining patents and more frequent invalidity findings in court actions.  </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
